The kinetics of blood between medicine and philosophy through the different races and strains

Abstract

Human groups have been categorized into tribes, clans, sub-families, and sub-groups, based on the blood relationship. Perhaps the perceptions and fantasies produced by philosophers about this issue confirm this classification. Plato emphasized in the banquet dialogue on the androgenic myth that the human being combines in its cellular origin the principle of masculinity and femininity together, and this was confirmed by embryology in our time considering the first formation of man as a cell that combines The features of femininity and masculinity, then in its fission the sex is determined, either male or female at all. He also attributed this distinction to an unknown collective memory identity. But what is worrisome is what happened There is a lot to harness blood to serve the purposes and objectives of the instrumental interest and ideological in depth. Especially since the mixing of human blood with each other over thousands of years confirmed the inability of some to prove the purity of their blood and thus their inability to accurately confirm the differentiation of their ancestral race. What raised about the totem blood the problem of the relationship between it and the relative referral or the so-called genealogy, so the issue of what are the first human origins was raised? What is the nature of blood in this double perception between medical and philosophical? Human groups have been categorized into tribes, clans, sub-families, and sub-groups, based on the blood relationship. Perhaps the perceptions and fantasies produced by philosophers about this issue confirm this classification. Plato emphasized in the banquet dialogue on the androgenic myth that the human being combines in its cellular origin the principle of masculinity and femininity together, and this was confirmed by embryology in our time considering the first formation of man as a cell that combines The features of femininity and masculinity, then in its fission the sex is determined, either male or female at all. He also attributed this distinction to an unknown collective memory identity. But what is worrisome is what happened There is a lot to harness blood to serve the purposes and objectives of the instrumental interest and ideological in depth. Especially since the mixing of human blood with each other over thousands of years confirmed the inability of some to prove the purity of their blood and thus their inability to accurately confirm the differentiation of their ancestral race. What raised about the totem blood the problem of the relationship between it and the relative referral or the so-called genealogy, so the issue of what are the first human origins was raised? What is the nature of blood in this double perception between medical and philosophical?